Quick comparison

TL;DR: Pick VibeHeader for fast, privacy‑first header edits and link sharing; pick Requestly for a broader rules platform.

DimensionVibeHeaderRequestly
Primary focusRequest headers, sharing workflowsHeaders, redirects, mocks, scripts
Ads / trackingNo ads, no trackingSee vendor policy
SharingLink via URL fragment on /sWorkspace/shared rules (account‑centric)
MV3MV3‑nativeSupported
Best forFast, simple header workflowsComplex, multi‑rule workflows

Requestly Alternative — Lightweight Header Editor

A focused, ad‑free header editor with streamlined workflows and one‑click share/apply — ideal when you don't need a full rule engine.

Product UI with slogan: Stop Copy‑Pasting Headers, Share & use with 1‑click

Table of contents

Quick summary

Deep‑dive: VibeHeader vs Requestly

1) Focus & scope

2) Collaboration & sharing

3) Privacy & telemetry

4) Performance & footprint

5) Setup & onboarding

6) Pricing & licensing

Who should pick what?

Migration guide

Migrating from a header rule in Requestly to VibeHeader typically maps 1‑to‑1.

  1. List active header rules and their matchers.
  2. Install VibeHeader for Chrome or Edge.
  3. Recreate rules with focused workflows; keep the set small and targeted.
  4. Share a config link using the Share action; teammates can open /s#c=, preview masked values, and apply with one click.

FAQ

🔒 Can I keep configs private?

Yes. Share uses URL fragment—nothing sent to servers. Secrets are automatically masked.

🔧 Do I lose complex features?

If you need redirects/mocks/scripts, keep Requestly. For headers only, VibeHeader is simpler.

⚡ Is MV3 supported?

VibeHeader is MV3‑native. Check store listings for other tools' versions.